12
Easy2Siksha
Background of Macaulay's Minute
Before 1835, the British East India Company, which was ruling large parts of India, was
involved in the administration of education. The company had two schools of thought
regarding education: the Orientalists and the Anglicists.
• Orientalists: This group believed that Indian education should continue to focus on
traditional subjects, including languages like Sanskrit and Persian, as well as Indian
literature, philosophy, and sciences. They thought that promoting Indian culture was
essential.
• Anglicists: This group, led by Macaulay, believed that the focus should be on
teaching English and Western knowledge, as they saw it as superior to Indian
learning systems. They argued that educating Indians in Western science,
philosophy, and literature would be more beneficial for the country.
In 1835, Macaulay wrote his famous Minute on Education, supporting the Anglicist point of
view. His recommendations ultimately influenced the future of education in India, and the
British government implemented many of his ideas.
Key Recommendations of Macaulay's Minute (1835)
1. Promotion of English as the Medium of Instruction: Macaulay argued that English
should replace Persian, Sanskrit, and other Indian languages as the medium of
instruction in Indian schools and colleges. He believed that English was a superior
language and would give Indians access to the wealth of European knowledge and
culture, which he considered more advanced than traditional Indian learning.
Macaulay famously said, "A single shelf of a good European library was worth the
whole native literature of India and Arabia."
2. Teaching of Western Sciences and Literature: Macaulay proposed that Indian
students should be taught Western sciences, philosophy, and literature. He argued
that this would help to create a class of educated Indians who would be "Indian in
blood and color, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect." These
individuals would help in governing India and act as intermediaries between the
British rulers and the Indian masses.
3. Funding for English Education: Macaulay suggested that the British government
should use its resources to promote English education rather than funding
traditional Indian education systems. He argued that investing in Sanskrit or Arabic
schools was a waste of money, as these languages and their associated knowledge
systems were, in his opinion, outdated and irrelevant in the modern world.
4. A "Downward Filtration" Policy: Macaulay believed that educating a small group of
upper-class Indians in English would lead to the gradual spread of English education
throughout Indian society. The educated elite would serve as role models and teach
the masses, creating a trickle-down effect. In this sense, education would not
directly reach the lower classes but would eventually filter down to them.